Difference between Quack and Unqualified

What is the difference between Quack and Unqualified?

Quack as an adjective is falsely presented as having medicinal powers. while Unqualified as an adjective is not qualified, ineligible, unfit for a position or task

Quack

Part of speech: noun

Definition: The sound made by a duck. A fraudulent healer or incompetent doctor of medicine, an impostor who claims to have qualifications to practice medicine. A charlatan. A doctor.

Part of speech: verb

Definition: To make a noise like a duck. To practice, commit quackery.

Part of speech: adjective

Definition: falsely presented as having medicinal powers.

Unqualified

Part of speech: adjective

Definition: not qualified, ineligible, unfit for a position or tasknot elaborated upon, undescribed

Example sentence: In the two novels I have published, it was my fortune at different times, and from different persons, to hear the most unqualified censure long before it was possible for me to hear the voice of the public. But my temper was not altered, nor my courage subdued.

We hope you now know whether to use Quack or Unqualified in your sentence.

Also read

Popular Articles