Difference between Unqualified and Quack

What is the difference between Unqualified and Quack?

Unqualified as an adjective is not qualified, ineligible, unfit for a position or task while Quack as an adjective is falsely presented as having medicinal powers.

Unqualified

Part of speech: adjective

Definition: not qualified, ineligible, unfit for a position or task not elaborated upon, undescribed

Example sentence: I have all this time between projects, and I'm not so sure that's a healthy thing. It's scary, because at 36 I'm woefully unqualified for anything else.

Quack

Part of speech: noun

Definition: The sound made by a duck.A fraudulent healer or incompetent doctor of medicine, an impostor who claims to have qualifications to practice medicine.A charlatan.A doctor.

Part of speech: verb

Definition: To make a noise like a duck.To practice, commit quackery.

Part of speech: adjective

Definition: falsely presented as having medicinal powers.

We hope you now know whether to use Unqualified or Quack in your sentence.

Also read

Popular Articles